SMWP - Condition Surveys and Professional Services

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and lack of e-submission, despite a clear description of services. Key information gaps severely compromise its overall quality and compliance.

The tender suffers from a critical lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental breach of procurement regulations. The procedure type, described as 'Open' and 'Competitive flexible procedure', is ambiguous. The missing tender reveal date also makes it difficult to assess the reasonableness of the submission timeframe accurately.

While the description of the required services and contract terms is clear and well-articulated, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermines the clarity of the tender process for potential bidders. Bidders lack essential information on how their proposals will be assessed.

The tender provides most basic information, including title, organization, value, and deadlines. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective, as essential information for preparing a compliant and competitive bid is missing.

Fairness is severely compromised by the absence of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque and subjective. The lack of e-submission creates barriers to equal access for all potential bidders. Furthermore, the submission deadline, while 15 days from today, could be considered short for a complex consultancy service, especially with an unknown reveal date.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While contract dates and duration are clearly specified, the absence of e-submission can complicate the bidding process for many potential suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no disputes or suspensions. However, there is a minor inconsistency between the stated '4 years' contract period in the description and the '55 months' contract duration. The procedure type also presents a slight ambiguity. The 'Liable Person' field is empty.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.