Fuel acquisition for ensuring the economic activities of SIA “LK Komunālie pakalpojumi”.

This tender for fuel supply is severely hampered by the critical lack of accessible documentation, which fundamentally undermines transparency and fair competition. While some evaluation criteria are outlined, the absence of full tender documents makes a comprehensive assessment impossible and poses significant risks for bidders.

The tender appears to follow basic procedural steps for an open procedure, including mandatory exclusion grounds. However, the lack of accessible documents makes it impossible to verify full compliance with national procurement laws regarding transparency and equal treatment.

The extracted requirements provide some clarity on technical and financial proposals, and evaluation criteria. However, the complete absence of tender documents means crucial details, terms, and conditions are missing, leading to significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Based solely on the extracted information, the tender outlines key requirements for eligibility, technical, and financial proposals. However, the critical absence of any attached tender documents renders the overall tender incomplete, as bidders cannot access the full scope of requirements, specifications, and contractual terms.

The stated evaluation criteria (distance, discounted prices) and the inverse proportion method are generally fair. However, the restricted access to tender documents creates a significant barrier to entry and severely compromises the principle of equal treatment and fair competition, as bidders cannot fully understand the requirements or prepare competitive bids.

The requirement for a local fuel station is practical for ensuring efficient supply. The multi-lot approach (Pļaviņas, Koknese, Part 3) is also practical for potentially attracting more localized suppliers. However, the lack of accessible documents makes it impractical for bidders to prepare and submit a compliant offer.

There's a minor inconsistency between the automated check flagging 'Missing evaluation criteria' and the extracted requirements clearly stating points for fuel station distance, diesel, and petrol. Otherwise, the extracted data seems consistent within itself.

No specific sustainability or social criteria are mentioned or flagged as present. This indicates a missed opportunity to incorporate environmental or social considerations into the procurement process.