LiveWest Workplace Facilities Management PPM & Reactive Maintenance

This tender exhibits significant quality concerns, primarily due to critical data inconsistencies regarding contract value and duration, and a complete absence of evaluation criteria. These issues severely impact clarity, fairness, and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately. However, the missing reveal date, lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary, and a critical discrepancy in contract duration and estimated value between the main data and the document summary pose significant legal compliance risks.

While the service description and basic technical requirements are clear, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity flaw. Furthermore, the conflicting information regarding contract duration and value creates substantial ambiguity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and locations. However, the 'Liable Person' is missing, and critically, evaluation criteria are entirely absent. The significant discrepancy in contract duration and value also represents a major gap in complete and reliable information.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines fairness, as bidders cannot understand the basis for award. The absence of electronic submission also limits equal access and transparency, although requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

The tender provides a contract start date and duration, but the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. Document access is implied, but a direct URL is not provided in the summary.

This category presents a critical failure. The 'Contract Duration: 24 months' and 'Estimated Value: 18,000,000.00 EUR' in the basic information directly contradict the 'Official PDF Version' summary stating 'potential 6-year contract' and 'estimated value of £15M'. This fundamental inconsistency severely compromises the tender's reliability.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.