Framework - Start Well (Children’s) Supported Services

This tender for supported services for vulnerable young people demonstrates good clarity in its service description and requirements, and a strong social focus. However, it is significantly hampered by missing evaluation criteria and notable data inconsistencies regarding contract duration and estimated value currency.

The procedure type and CPV codes are correctly defined. The open framework with rolling applications and a long initial submission deadline is reasonable. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for framework admission is a significant legal compliance gap, as is the missing reveal date for initial transparency.

The description of the services, target group, lots, and geographical scope is very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are also well-documented and understandable. The primary detractor from clarity is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, leaving bidders uncertain about the assessment process.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description are present. Requirements are defined. However, there are inconsistencies in the stated contract duration (72 months vs. 'up to 2032') and the currency for the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP). The lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the ambiguity of the 'Official PDF Version' being 'Required: No' suggest potential gaps in the full tender documentation.

The open framework with rolling application windows and a very long initial submission deadline promotes broad access and ample preparation time. E-procurement is indicated, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. Nevertheless, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria for framework admission is a significant fairness concern, as bidders cannot fully understand the basis of selection.

E-procurement is listed as a characteristic, which is positive for submission. The contract start date is known. However, a direct document URL is not provided in the given data, which is a practical hurdle for interested parties. The inconsistency in contract duration could also lead to practical confusion for long-term planning.

All key fields are populated, and there are no disputes or suspensions. However, there are clear inconsistencies: the estimated value is stated as EUR in one field and £ (GBP) in the description, and the contract duration is stated as 72 months in one field but 'up to 2032' (9 years from 2023) in the description.

The tender inherently focuses on significant social aspects by providing accommodation and support to vulnerable young people aged 16-25, including those under the care of the Council. This is a strong positive for social sustainability. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement criteria or innovation focus.