EEAST - Planned and Reactive UPS Systems Maintenance (250903)

This tender provides a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in evaluation criteria and data consistency, impacting transparency and fairness.

The procedure type and CPV codes are clear, but the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and specified evaluation criteria are notable shortcomings. The 'Official PDF Version' being marked as 'Required: No' is also unusual.

While the service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a severe flaw, making it difficult for bidders to understand the basis for award decisions.

Basic information is present, but critical elements such as evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are missing. Furthermore, there is a significant discrepancy in estimated value and contract duration between the basic information and the document summary.

The absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw for fairness, as it prevents transparency in how bids will be judged. The lack of e-submission also hinders equal access. Requirements themselves do not appear tailored.

The lack of an e-submission option is a significant practical drawback. While documents are available, a direct URL is not explicitly provided. Contract start date and duration are known.

The inconsistency in estimated value (72,000 EUR vs £60,000) and contract duration (36 months vs up to 5 years) between the basic information and the official document summary is a serious data consistency issue.

The tender makes no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a low level of integration for sustainability considerations.