Dynamic Procurement System for Local Bus and Education Bus Services 2022- 2032

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) with a clear purpose and long duration, but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements, impacting clarity and fairness.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (DPS) and CPV codes, and the main application deadline is exceptionally long. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria for DPS admission are notable legal compliance issues.

The overall description of the DPS and its scope is clear. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria for DPS admission and specific financial requirements significantly reduces the clarity for potential applicants.

Basic information, estimated value, and duration are well-defined. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and, most importantly, the evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria for DPS admission severely compromises fairness and transparency. The warning about potentially short response times for mini-competitions, while disclosed, also presents a challenge for equal access and preparation.

The duration is clearly specified. However, there is a contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and the automated check flagging 'No e-submission', which impacts practicality. The lack of a direct document URL is a minor inconvenience, and the short mini-competition response times could pose practical challenges for suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical for a long-term DPS. The main inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding e-submission capabilities ('E-Procurement' characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' flag).

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It appears to be a standard procurement without specific sustainability criteria.