On the development of a construction project and author supervision for the object "Reconstruction of the building at Miera Street 58a (cad. No. 0100 026 2024 005)"

This tender for building reconstruction design and supervision suffers from critical deficiencies, primarily the complete absence of accessible tender documents and undisclosed estimated value, severely hindering transparency and fair competition.

The tender is EU-funded, implying adherence to EU public procurement directives. However, the lack of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the summary, coupled with no accessible documents, makes it impossible to verify full compliance. The requirement for bid security is generally compliant.

The summary provides basic information, but the complete absence of tender documents makes it impossible for potential bidders to understand the full scope, detailed requirements, and evaluation methodology. The '5 points' for a project manager suggests a scoring system, but the full criteria are missing.

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Key elements such as the full tender documents, detailed eligibility and exclusion criteria, estimated value, and comprehensive evaluation criteria are missing.

The absence of accessible tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria creates a significant barrier to fair competition. Bidders cannot adequately prepare offers or understand how they will be judged, potentially favoring those with prior insider knowledge. The lack of disclosed value also impacts fairness.

From a bidder's perspective, it is highly impractical to prepare a competitive offer without access to the full tender documents, detailed specifications, and evaluation criteria. The requirement for bid security without full project details adds risk.

There is a minor inconsistency between the stated 'Contract Duration: 5 months' and the 'Commit to a contract performance term of 170 days' (approximately 5.6 months). While minor, it indicates a potential lack of precision in documentation.

The provided information does not include any details regarding sustainability requirements or green procurement aspects. The automated check also flags 'Not green procurement.'