Construction supervision within the framework of the project "Ensuring housing accessibility for persons with disabilities in Jelgava state city"

This tender suffers from a critical lack of accessible documentation and essential information, making a comprehensive assessment impossible and severely hindering fair competition. Key details such as the estimated value, full tender documents, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

The tender mentions an open procedure and mandatory exclusion grounds, which are basic legal requirements. However, the complete absence of tender documents, detailed requirements, and evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding compliance with transparency, equal treatment, and proportionality principles, especially for an EU-funded project.

While the project title and brief description are clear, the complete absence of tender documents means all specific requirements, technical specifications, scope of work, and contractual terms are entirely unclear. This makes it impossible for potential bidders to understand what is being procured.

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Critical elements such as the full tender documents, detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and estimated value are entirely missing, rendering it impossible for bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer.

The complete lack of accessible tender documents, evaluation criteria, and estimated value fundamentally undermines the principles of fairness and equal treatment. Without this information, potential bidders cannot understand the scope, prepare competitive bids, or ensure transparency in the selection process. This creates a significant barrier to entry and could inadvertently favor bidders with prior insider knowledge, raising concerns about potential tailoring.

From a bidder's perspective, this tender is highly impractical. Without any accessible documents, it is impossible to understand the scope of work, technical requirements, or submission process, making it unfeasible to prepare a bid. For the contracting authority, this approach risks receiving no bids or non-compliant bids.

The limited data provided is internally consistent (e.g., title matches description). However, the use of a highly generic CPV code '1' ('Construction work') for a specific service like 'construction supervision' is inconsistent with standard classification practices and hinders searchability.

The automated check explicitly states 'Not green procurement'. Given the complete absence of tender documents, there is no indication of any environmental, social, or governance (ESG) considerations or sustainability requirements for the construction supervision services.