Cleaning services for British Embassy in Rome

This tender for cleaning services at the British Embassy in Rome provides clear basic information and requirements but is significantly hampered by the absence of specified evaluation criteria and lack of e-submission, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The tender defines an Open procedure and assigns a correct CPV code. The 22-day submission period is reasonable. However, the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary represent significant legal transparency concerns.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria makes it unclear to bidders how their proposals will be assessed, significantly reducing the overall clarity of the tender process.

Most essential information such as title, organization, value, duration, and location is provided. Requirements for eligibility, technical, financial, and submission are outlined. Nevertheless, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds makes the tender documentation incomplete.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely undermines the objectivity and fairness of the bidding process. Additionally, the lack of e-submission can hinder equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

The data is largely consistent, with logical dates and no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'Code: N/A' for Type/Procedure, as well as a slight currency conversion difference between EUR and GBP values, which are not critical.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.