Eastern Main Road, Stage 3 'Brīvības gatve and Gustava Zemgala gatve intersection' – feasibility study

This tender for the preliminary study of the 'Austrumu maģistrāle 3. kārta' project is severely hampered by a critical lack of accessible documentation, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare informed proposals and raising significant transparency concerns.

The tender outlines basic legal compliance elements such as mandatory exclusion grounds and general eligibility requirements. However, the absence of accessible tender documents, including the full Terms of Reference and evaluation criteria, significantly compromises the transparency and fairness essential for a legally sound procurement process.

Clarity is extremely low due to the complete absence of accessible tender documents. Bidders cannot fully understand the scope, detailed specifications (Appendix 2), or the basis for evaluation, making it impossible to formulate a clear and compliant proposal.

The tender information provided is highly incomplete. While basic administrative details are present, all critical documents, such as the full tender specifications, Terms of Reference (Appendix 2), and evaluation criteria, are missing, rendering the tender effectively incomplete for bidding purposes.

Fairness is severely compromised. The lack of accessible documents and undisclosed evaluation criteria create an uneven playing field, potentially favoring bidders with prior knowledge or internal access to information. This undermines the principles of equal treatment and transparency.

From a bidder's perspective, preparing a proposal for this tender is highly impractical, if not impossible, without access to the full tender documents. The requirements listed are too generic to allow for a meaningful technical or financial submission.

Cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of detailed content. The limited information provided appears consistent, but the absence of core documents prevents a comprehensive check.

No information regarding sustainability or green procurement requirements is provided within the extracted content or flagged by the automated check. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate environmental or social considerations.