Latvia7 days leftOpen

Daily maintenance of Skulte parish territory

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Vidzeme, Latvia

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

February 09, 2026 at 10:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

90910000

REFERENCE

163238

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Daily maintenance of Skulte parish territory
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summary.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit qualification documents.
  • Be legally capable of providing daily maintenance services for Skulte parish territory.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a technical proposal for the daily maintenance of Skulte parish territory.
  • Note: There are no specific technical evaluation criteria mentioned in the provided summary.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a financial proposal.
  • The financial proposal must state the price excluding VAT.
  • The tender will be evaluated solely based on the lowest price offered.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit an application form.
  • Submit qualification documents.
  • Submit a technical proposal.
  • Submit a financial proposal with the price excluding VAT.
  • Submit the tender by the deadline: 2026-02-09 10:00:00.
  • Do not submit variants; variants are not accepted.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija
actualIepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija
Summary:
This document outlines the comprehensive requirements for submitting a tender for the daily maintenance of Skulte parish territory. It details mandatory submission documents, including application forms, qualification documents, a technical proposal, and a financial proposal with the price excluding VAT. The tender will be evaluated solely based on the lowest price offered, with no specific technical evaluation criteria.
DOC
Nolikums ar pielikumiem
actualNolikums ar pielikumiem
Summary:
Document: Nolikums ar pielikumiem. AI analysis could not be completed.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender suffers from a severe lack of detailed documentation and evaluation criteria, making it highly opaque and challenging for potential bidders to prepare competitive and compliant offers. The sole reliance on the lowest price for service procurement without technical evaluation raises significant concerns regarding quality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

While basic legal requirements for an open procedure are met, the absence of detailed tender documents and specific evaluation criteria raises concerns regarding transparency and equal treatment principles. The lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, even if implied by law, is also a minor compliance clarity issue.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided summary
Missing evaluation criteria for technical proposals
Clarity40/100

The tender is extremely vague across all key areas, including eligibility, technical requirements, and the scope of services. The broad CPV code and general description further contribute to this lack of clarity.

Vague eligibility requirements ('Submit qualification documents', 'Be legally capable')
Vague technical requirements ('Submit a technical proposal')
Completeness75/100

The tender is critically incomplete, lacking essential documents, an estimated value, and specific evaluation criteria. This makes it impossible for bidders to understand the full scope and expectations.

No documents attached or available for review
Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness40/100

The absence of tender documents and specific evaluation criteria, coupled with restricted document access, creates a significant risk of unfair competition and potential tailoring. Evaluating solely on the lowest price for services without assessing technical quality can disadvantage more capable bidders.

Restricted document access, creating an uneven playing field
No specific technical evaluation criteria, leading to subjective assessment or no assessment of quality for a service contract
Practicality40/100

The tender's severe lack of detail and missing documents make it highly impractical for bidders to formulate comprehensive and competitive proposals. The contracting authority will also face challenges in evaluating submissions based on such vague requirements.

Bidders cannot prepare adequate proposals without tender documents and clear requirements
Challenges for the contracting authority in evaluating vague submissions and ensuring best value
Data Consistency100/100

The provided summary information is internally consistent, but consistently highlights a severe lack of detail and missing critical components necessary for a robust procurement process.

Sustainability0/100

There is no mention of any environmental, social, or governance criteria, indicating a missed opportunity for green procurement and sustainable practices.

No sustainability or green procurement criteria specified

Strengths

Open procedure promotes competition
Clear contract duration (36 months)
Basic identification information (title, reference, organization) is provided
Requirements are broadly outlined, even if vague

Concerns

Critical lack of tender documents and content, with restricted access
Absence of specific technical evaluation criteria for a service contract
Sole reliance on lowest price for service evaluation, risking quality and value for money
Vague eligibility and technical requirements, hindering proper bid preparation
High risk of tailoring due to restricted information and lack of transparency

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all tender documents with detailed requirements and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value to aid bidder planning and enhance transparency.
3. Introduce clear, objective technical evaluation criteria alongside price to ensure quality of service and best value for money.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
63/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes