Vadības un automatizācijas sistēmas reglamenta apkope un remonts valsts akciju sabiedrības “Valsts nekustamie īpašumi” objektos

This tender for maintenance and repair services exhibits good clarity and data consistency in its basic information, but is critically undermined by restricted document access, which severely compromises fairness, legal compliance, and practicality for potential bidders.

The tender defines an open procedure and provides a reasonable submission deadline. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant legal transparency issue, hindering compliance with fundamental procurement principles. The CPV code '0' is a minor data inconsistency.

The tender description is clear, and requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial proposals are referenced to specific documents. A financial offer template is also provided, contributing to overall clarity.

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and duration, is present. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly impacts the completeness from a bidder's perspective. Additionally, the technical specification document being marked as 'Required: No' is a notable omission for a core tender document.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw that severely undermines fairness and equal opportunity for all potential bidders, as they cannot fully review the tender terms and conditions. While the value is disclosed and the deadline is reasonable, this access restriction is paramount.

E-procurement is indicated, which is a positive for practicality. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly hinders the practical ability of bidders to prepare and submit proposals. An explicit contract start date is not provided.

Key dates and financial information are consistent. However, inconsistencies exist with the CPV code '0', the 'Required: No' status for the technical specification, and contradictions between automated checks (e.g., 'No e-submission', 'Missing evaluation criteria') and other tender data.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.