Riga, Latvia
€41,322
February 04, 2026 at 08:00
Other
163551
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for a media literacy study is generally well-structured with clear requirements and forms, but it suffers from critical issues regarding document accessibility and inconsistencies in e-submission capabilities, alongside missing contract duration and a lack of sustainability considerations.
The tender defines the procedure and CPV code clearly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the flagged "Restricted document access" is a significant concern that could impede fair competition and legal compliance if bidders cannot fully access the tender documents.
The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-structured, referencing specific forms and a detailed technical specification document. The AI summary for "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" indicates that evaluation criteria are specified, which enhances clarity.
Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, value, and deadlines, is provided. However, the absence of a specified contract duration is a notable omission that can create uncertainty for bidders.
The disclosed value and reasonable submission deadline contribute positively to fairness. However, the "Restricted document access" flag is a major concern, potentially hindering equal access to information. The contradiction between "E-Procurement" and "No e-submission" also creates ambiguity regarding equal access mechanisms. Requirements do not appear tailored.
Practicality is significantly hampered by the potential lack of e-submission capabilities (despite being listed as an e-procurement characteristic) and the absence of a clear contract start date and duration.
While key dates are logical, there are significant inconsistencies, particularly the contradiction between the "E-Procurement" characteristic and the "No e-submission" flag, and the discrepancy regarding the presence of evaluation criteria between automated checks and document summaries.
The tender does not incorporate any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a missed opportunity for promoting sustainable practices.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes