Clearing of 0.4-20kV power transmission line routes in Daugavpils sections of AS "Sadales tīkls" Eastern Network Department, Ventspils sections of Western Network Department, Ķekava sections of Vidzeme Network Department

This tender for power line route cleaning services demonstrates good structural organization and clarity in its requirements, but the reported restricted document access significantly undermines its fairness and completeness.

The tender defines an open procedure, provides a relevant CPV code, and specifies reasonable deadlines. The 'WTO/GPA' characteristic suggests adherence to international standards. However, the flag for 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, potentially indicating a breach of mandatory disclosure requirements and lowering the overall compliance score.

The tender's description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements, along with the summaries of the various documents (regulations, technical specifications, draft agreement), indicate well-documented and understandable requirements. Evaluation criteria based on the 'lowest price' are explicitly stated for all parts.

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and duration, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined across the various tender parts. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag means that while the information exists, it may not be fully accessible to all potential bidders, impacting completeness from a practical standpoint.

The tender benefits from a disclosed value, objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria, and e-procurement support, which generally promote fairness. The division into parts also encourages broader participation. Nevertheless, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical issue that severely compromises equal access to information and thus the overall fairness of the procurement process.

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly hinders the practical ability of bidders to prepare and submit a comprehensive offer. The exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies exist with automated flags (e.g., 'No e-submission' contradicted by 'E-Procurement'), but the core tender data is largely consistent.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. While the service itself has environmental implications, no specific sustainability criteria are outlined in the requirements.