Adaptation of the Riga State Technical School's infrastructure object at Piedrujas Street 17, Riga, for data center needs

This tender for data center infrastructure adaptation is well-documented with clear requirements, but restricted document access significantly impacts fairness and transparency. While e-procurement is supported, the tender lacks explicit sustainability or social criteria.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and reasonable submission deadlines. Mandatory disclosure requirements are met for key information. Minor issues include 'N/A' codes for type and procedure.

The project description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-structured across eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Performance conditions are clearly referenced to the technical specification and draft contract. Document 9 explicitly mentions evaluation criteria, resolving a potential discrepancy.

The tender provides all basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location. A comprehensive set of 10 documents is listed, with 9 having content summaries. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, potentially limiting full information availability.

While the estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and e-procurement is enabled, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical issue that severely undermines fairness and equal access to information for all potential bidders. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a significant practical advantage. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, an explicit document URL is not provided, and a specific contract start date is not available, which are minor practical omissions.

Key fields are generally populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies exist between automated checks and document summaries regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission, but the document content summaries provide clarity.

The tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a missed opportunity for incorporating modern procurement values.