Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns appropriate CPV/NUTS codes. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds in the provided text is a notable concern for full legal compliance and transparency.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned.
•No explicit eligibility requirements mentioned beyond 'production company'.
Clarity60/100
While the service description is clear, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. Many technical requirements are qualitative and would benefit from more measurable definitions.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
•Technical requirements are qualitative and lack measurable specifics.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds. Furthermore, only one of four listed documents is summarized, indicating incomplete documentation disclosure.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds.
Fairness65/100
The use of an e-procurement portal promotes equal access, and the value is disclosed. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot objectively prepare or assess their chances. The fixed price could also limit competition.
•No evaluation criteria specified, hindering transparency and objective assessment.
•Fixed price may limit competition.
Practicality85/100
The tender provides clear instructions for accessing documentation via an e-tendering portal, supports electronic submission, and specifies the contract start date and duration. Financing information (fixed price) is also available.
Data Consistency40/100
A significant inconsistency exists between the estimated value in EUR (468,000.00 EUR) and the fixed annual price in GBP (£65,000 per annum for three years, equating to £195,000 GBP or approximately 229,411 EUR). This major discrepancy is a critical flaw. Minor inconsistencies exist in contract duration (34 months vs. 'three years').
•Major discrepancy between estimated EUR value and fixed annual GBP price.
•Minor inconsistency in contract duration (34 months vs. 3 years).
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. While the service itself has inherent social value, the procurement process does not actively seek or reward these aspects from bidders.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.