Provision of Applicant Tracking System

This tender for an Applicant Tracking System provides clear technical requirements and basic information but suffers from significant gaps in clarity, completeness, and practicality, notably the absence of evaluation criteria and e-submission.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code, and no disputes are noted. Deadlines appear reasonable. However, the 'N/A' codes for procedure types and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion/eligibility/financial requirements in the summary (requiring reference to full documents) indicate a slight lack of immediate transparency. The missing reveal date is also a minor compliance issue.

The core technical requirements for the ATS are clearly stated. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be assessed. The summary also lacks detailed information on standard exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the AI summary, which are crucial for a comprehensive tender package.

While technical requirements appear generic and the value is disclosed, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency. The lack of e-submission also creates an unequal playing field and hinders equal access for all potential bidders.

The tender's practicality is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission capabilities, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. The absence of a direct document URL also adds an unnecessary barrier for interested parties.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent, including the contract start date aligning with the existing contract's end. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure types.

The tender shows a very low focus on sustainability, with no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.