Paisley Halloween Festival 2026/27/28 - Lighting and Projection

This tender presents a clear project description and includes positive social sustainability aspects, but is significantly hampered by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and financial requirements, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines an open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the absence of evaluation criteria in the provided summaries raise concerns regarding full compliance with transparency requirements.

The project description and core technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and explicit financial requirements in the summaries significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are well-defined, and documents are indicated as available. Nevertheless, the tender lacks explicit financial requirements and, most notably, detailed evaluation criteria, which are fundamental components of a complete tender package.

While the value is disclosed and document access is implied, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness and transparency. This omission makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be objectively assessed, potentially leading to subjective decision-making.

The contract start date and duration are clear. However, there is a contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check stating 'No e-submission', which creates uncertainty regarding the practical submission process. A direct document URL was not explicitly provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The tender status is active with no disputes. Minor inconsistencies include missing 'Liable Person' and 'N/A' codes for procedure type, as well as the contradiction regarding e-submission.

The inclusion of '30 Community Benefit Points' is a strong positive, demonstrating a focus on social sustainability. However, the tender does not explicitly mention green procurement or innovation aspects, nor is it EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.