Audit of HIE Group Companies

This tender for audit and tax services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and an open procedure, but significantly lacks explicit evaluation criteria. While basic information is provided, the absence of full document summaries and a direct document URL in the provided data presents minor practical hurdles.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date in the provided information makes it impossible to verify compliance with minimum advertising periods, and the summary lacks detail on mandatory exclusion grounds, which should be clearly stated or referenced.

The description of services and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback, as bidders cannot fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, financial details, and duration are well-defined. Requirements are outlined, but the explicit lack of evaluation criteria is a major completeness gap. Additionally, only one of four tender documents was summarized, suggesting potential missing details in the provided overview.

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and disclosed value. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the absence of evaluation criteria significantly compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and relevant proposals.

Electronic submission is indicated, and the contract start date, duration, and financing information are clear. A notable practical concern is the absence of a direct document URL in the provided information, which could hinder easy access to full tender documents for potential bidders.

Data is largely consistent, with logical dates and no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and a contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check stating 'No e-submission'. The EUR/GBP value conversion is noted but not a critical inconsistency.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While this is common for audit services, it indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations into the procurement process.