Window Cleaning Services

This tender for window cleaning services presents significant gaps in critical legal and procedural documentation, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and explicit eligibility requirements, which could hinder fair competition and transparency. While basic information is present, the overall quality is moderate due to these fundamental omissions.

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type and CPV code. However, the absence of a clear reveal date, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements are significant legal compliance deficiencies. These are fundamental for a legally sound procurement process.

The service description and technical capability requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly impacting overall clarity. The lack of explicit exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements also contributes to a lack of comprehensive clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria. The status of the 'Official PDF Version' being 'not required' is also unusual and suggests potential incompleteness in the provided tender package or its structure.

The tender benefits from being an open procedure, having a disclosed value, and supporting e-procurement, with the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic promoting competition. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents objective and transparent assessment. The missing reveal date and lack of explicit eligibility/financial criteria could also lead to subjective judgments, undermining equal treatment.

Electronic submission via the Proactis platform is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of a direct document URL makes it less practical for potential bidders to easily access the full tender documentation. Detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is also not provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, a minor inconsistency exists between the estimated value stated in the basic information (EUR) and the value mentioned in the PDF summary (GBP equivalent). More significantly, there is a contradiction between the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' stating e-submission is supported and the 'AUTOMATED CHECK RESULTS' stating 'No e-submission'.

The tender does not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a low priority for sustainability considerations in this procurement.