KMCFM-001 Construction Materials and Ancillary Products DPS

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for construction materials. While it benefits from clear procedural definition and electronic submission, significant concerns arise from the classified estimated value and, most critically, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which severely impacts fairness and clarity for potential bidders.

The tender clearly defines the procedure as a Dynamic Purchasing System under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, and the CPV code is appropriate. The submission deadline is ample. However, the estimated value is classified, and the reveal date is missing, which are minor disclosure issues.

The overall description of the DPS is clear. However, the AI-extracted requirements are high-level, lacking specific detail for what constitutes 'suitably qualified' or 'adequate provision'. Crucially, there are no specific financial requirements stated, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing, making it difficult for bidders to understand how they will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and duration are provided. However, the estimated value is classified, and there is a critical absence of evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements, which are fundamental for a complete tender document.

The tender supports e-procurement and the requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the classified estimated value reduces transparency, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major concern, as bidders cannot objectively understand the basis for admission to the DPS.

Electronic submission via YORtender.co.uk is supported, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract start date for the DPS is not explicitly known, and detailed financing information (beyond the classified value) is absent.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the 'Liable Person' field being empty and the statement 'Over Sum Limit: No' conflicting with the classified estimated value.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. The tender is not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.