DAPL Reopening - Primary Care Services - i1429

This tender for a Dynamic Approved Provider List (DAPL) for Primary Care Services is generally well-structured in its basic information but suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly regarding undisclosed value and missing evaluation criteria.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns appropriate CPV codes. There are no reported disputes. However, the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, undisclosed estimated value, and missing evaluation criteria represent significant legal compliance gaps. The tender reveal date is also missing, preventing a full assessment of the initial preparation period, though the time from today to the submission deadline is reasonable.

The description of the DAPL and its three lots is clear and unambiguous. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-defined. However, the overall clarity is significantly hampered by the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of detailed financial requirements and mandatory exclusion grounds, leaving bidders uncertain about key assessment parameters.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, CPV, and NUTS code are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, missing financial requirements, and the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria. Furthermore, only a summary of one document is provided, indicating a lack of full tender documentation access, and the reveal date is not specified.

The tender promotes fairness through its open procedure, division into parts (lots), and explicit mention of E-Procurement. The requirements for eligibility and technical capability appear generic and not tailored. The submission deadline provides ample time for preparation from today's date. Nevertheless, the undisclosed estimated value, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria, and the lack of full document access significantly detract from overall fairness and equal opportunity.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a positive for practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a direct document URL makes it impractical for bidders to easily access full tender details. The undisclosed estimated value and absence of specific financial requirements also create practical challenges for potential providers in assessing the opportunity.

The data is largely consistent, with the DAPL nature explaining the reference to 2022 while having a 2026 submission deadline. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'Code: N/A' for Type and Procedure, but these do not significantly impede understanding.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement criteria, social aspects beyond the inherent nature of primary care services, or an innovation focus. It is not EU funded. Therefore, its contribution to sustainability objectives is not explicitly defined.