Supply of Cadet Uniform

This tender provides basic information but suffers from significant gaps in transparency and completeness, notably the undisclosed value, missing evaluation criteria, and lack of e-submission, which collectively impact fairness and clarity.

The tender lacks a crucial reveal date, making it impossible to assess the reasonableness of the preparation period. The estimated value is classified, and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are not stated in the summary. While 'Below threshold' procedures allow for more flexibility, these omissions are notable.

The description of the requirement is clear, and technical capabilities are understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and explicit financial requirements significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.

While basic information, deadlines, and duration are present, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, missing evaluation criteria, and the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided summary. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. The lack of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access. The 'UK supplier' requirement, while common for below-threshold tenders, limits competition.

The absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the lack of specific financing information beyond the undisclosed value reduces practicality for bidders.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no disputes. However, several key fields are missing or not explicitly populated, such as the liable person, estimated value, reveal date, and detailed evaluation/exclusion/financial criteria, indicating inconsistencies in data provision.

The tender shows no explicit focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which typically correlates with higher sustainability standards.