Legal Compliance70/100
The tender clearly identifies as a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), a recognized procurement tool. However, classifying it as a 'Restricted procedure' contradicts the open nature of a DPS. The CPV code for 'Signage' appears overly specific for a broad 'Goods and/or Services' DPS, potentially limiting its legal scope. Mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly stated in the summary.
•Contradictory procedure type (Restricted vs. DPS)
•Overly specific CPV for broad scope
Clarity65/100
The description of the SEDPS's purpose and its focus on social enterprises is clear. Eligibility requirements are well-defined. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria for joining the DPS or for subsequent call-offs is a significant clarity issue. Specific financial requirements are also not explicitly stated in the provided summary.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No explicit financial requirements in summary
Completeness60/100
Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements in the provided summary. The reliance on external webpages for 'further information' suggests the provided data might not represent the full, comprehensive tender documentation.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness55/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and the long application period for a DPS ensures reasonable time for preparation. E-procurement is indicated, promoting equal access. Requirements are tailored to social enterprises, which is fair for this specific DPS. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, preventing applicants from understanding how they will be assessed, severely impacting transparency and objectivity.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality80/100
Electronic submission is supported as indicated by the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the provision of an email and webpage for application. Relevant URLs are provided for additional information. The contract start date (DPS opening) and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for a DPS.
Data Consistency65/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical for a DPS. No suspensions or disputes are reported. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the nature of a 'Dynamic Purchasing System,' which is an open procedure. The CPV code for 'Signage' also appears inconsistent with the broad scope of 'Goods and/or Services' intended for the DPS.
•Contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System'
•CPV code inconsistency with broad scope
Sustainability85/100
This tender is explicitly and fundamentally designed around social sustainability. Its core objective is to engage social enterprises and further National Highways' commitment to social value, with a link to their Social Value Plan provided. While it does not explicitly highlight green procurement or innovation, its strong focus on social aspects is a significant positive contribution to sustainability.
•No explicit focus on green procurement or innovation