Legal Compliance75/100
The tender generally adheres to a DPS framework, but the explicit lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, as highlighted by the AI-extracted requirements, represents a notable legal compliance gap. CPV codes are appropriate, and no disputes are flagged.
•No explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds provided.
Clarity40/100
While the overall purpose and scope of the DPS (low carbon offsite MMC housing) are clearly described, the tender severely lacks clarity regarding specific supplier requirements and, critically, the evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS. This makes it difficult for potential suppliers to understand the application process.
•Missing specific supplier requirements.
•No evaluation criteria specified for DPS admission.
Completeness50/100
Basic information such as title, organization, value, and duration is complete. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria, along with a single, brief document summary, indicates a significant lack of comprehensive documentation for a tender of this scale.
•Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing evaluation criteria for DPS admission.
Fairness45/100
The use of a DPS and e-procurement generally promotes fairness. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for joining the DPS severely undermines transparency and objectivity, making it challenging for suppliers to understand how their applications will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity.
Practicality75/100
Electronic submission is supported via the ProContract portal, and key dates (contract start, duration, submission deadline) are clearly specified. The lack of a direct document URL is a minor inconvenience, but access via the portal is outlined.
•No direct document URL provided, requiring portal registration for access.
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical for an active DPS. There is a minor inconsistency in labeling the procedure as 'Restricted' while explicitly describing it as a 'DPS Agreement', though a DPS is a type of restricted procedure. The 'Liable Person' field is empty.
•Minor inconsistency in procedure type labeling (Restricted vs. DPS).
•Liable Person field is empty.
Sustainability80/100
The tender demonstrates a strong focus on sustainability, explicitly targeting 'Low Carbon Offsite MMC Housing Construction' and 'zero carbon solutions'. It also highlights an 'Innovation Focus' with the mention of a digital toolkit. However, no explicit social aspects are mentioned.
•No explicit social aspects mentioned in the tender description.