Ongoing Applications for our Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the Provision of Education, Social Care & Ad-Hoc Transport Services

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is generally clear in its purpose but suffers from significant gaps in critical information such as evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements, impacting overall transparency and completeness.

The procedure type (DPS) and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements in the provided summary raises concerns regarding full compliance with disclosure standards.

The description of the DPS purpose and scope is clear. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS, coupled with the lack of detail on mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential suppliers.

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements, which are crucial for a comprehensive application.

The requirements appear generic, and e-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. The long submission deadline is fair for a DPS. However, the classified value and, critically, the absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermine transparency and fairness for applicants.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a specific contract start date for the DPS and the classified value slightly reduce the practicality for suppliers planning their engagement.

The data is largely consistent, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions like the 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure types do not significantly impact overall consistency.

The inclusion of 'Social Criteria' is a positive aspect contributing to sustainability. However, the explicit absence of green procurement or innovation focus, and not being EU funded, limits the overall sustainability score.