Legal Compliance70/100
The tender lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a legal requirement. The potentially misleading duration of the DPS for new entrants, given the submission deadline close to the DPS end date, could also raise transparency and equal treatment concerns.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Potential for misleading DPS duration for new entrants
Clarity50/100
While the service description is clear, the DPS timeline for new applicants is highly ambiguous. The complete absence of evaluation criteria for joining the DPS is a major clarity flaw, making the application process opaque.
•Ambiguous DPS timeline for new applicants
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness55/100
Basic information is present, but critical details such as explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria are missing. The mention of a single document with 'Required: No' is also unusual.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing financial requirements
Fairness30/100
The absence of evaluation criteria is a severe fairness concern, as it prevents objective assessment. Furthermore, the extremely short effective participation window for new applicants due to the DPS end date significantly impacts fairness, potentially discouraging new competition.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Extremely short effective participation window for new applicants
Practicality30/100
Electronic submission is supported via the provided portal. However, the DPS ending almost immediately after the application deadline for new entrants makes it highly impractical for them to join and benefit from the system.
•Impractical effective participation duration for new applicants
Data Consistency40/100
There is a minor currency inconsistency (£ vs EUR) for the estimated value. More significantly, the conflicting information regarding the DPS duration for new applicants versus the stated end date (March 2026) makes the '48 months' duration misleading for new entrants.
•Currency inconsistency (£ vs EUR)
•Conflicting information on DPS duration for new applicants
Sustainability20/100
The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, resulting in a low score for sustainability.
•No sustainability, social, or innovation criteria