Delivery of new passenger minibuses to Limbaži Municipality

This tender for passenger minibuses demonstrates good clarity and data consistency but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, raising serious concerns about fairness and transparency.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements such as reasonable deadlines, clear procedure type, and correct CPV codes. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the restricted document access raise significant concerns regarding transparency and compliance with full disclosure principles.

The tender's description is clear, and the AI summaries indicate that detailed requirements, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are present within the attached documents ('Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'). A minor ambiguity exists due to a flag indicating 'No evaluation criteria specified' at the top level, which contradicts the document summaries.

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. However, the estimated value of the procurement is not disclosed, which is a significant omission impacting the overall completeness.

Fairness is severely compromised by the 'Restricted document access,' which prevents equal access to critical tender information for all potential bidders. The undisclosed estimated value further hinders bidders' ability to assess the opportunity fairly. While deadlines are reasonable, the lack of transparency on document access and value significantly undermines the competitive process.

The practicality for bidders is negatively affected by the 'Restricted document access,' making it difficult to obtain necessary information. While e-procurement is listed as a characteristic, a conflicting flag of 'No e-submission' creates uncertainty. The absence of a specific contract start date and financing details also reduces practicality.

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the estimated value field is not populated, and there's a contradiction regarding e-submission support between the characteristics and automated checks.

The tender lacks any explicit mention or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.