Comprehensive Town Council Insurance Policy

This tender for a comprehensive insurance policy presents significant transparency and completeness issues, particularly due to missing evaluation criteria and incomplete document access, despite clear basic information.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the value being disclosed raises transparency concerns. The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds in the AI summary is also a compliance risk.

While the general description and specific requirements for terrorism and cyber-crime cover are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity. The reliance on an 'accompanying proposal schedule' without its content being provided or summarized also creates ambiguity.

Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to 3 out of 4 documents missing content/summaries, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion/eligibility criteria.

Fairness is severely impacted by the lack of evaluation criteria, which prevents bidders from understanding how their proposals will be judged. Incomplete document access, the contradictory value classification, and the absence of e-submission further reduce transparency and equal access for potential bidders.

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. The absence of a clear document URL or portal link for full tender documents also poses a practical challenge. Contract start and duration are clearly specified.

The most significant inconsistency is the simultaneous disclosure of the estimated value (70,000.00 EUR) and the classification of the value as 'Yes'. This is a direct contradiction. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty, and procedure codes are marked 'N/A'.

The tender does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.