United Kingdom3 days leftOpen

1004169075 2025-SUS-004 Cost Benefit Analysis of Noise Mitigation on the Rail Network

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Inner London - West, United Kingdom

VALUE

£60,000

DEADLINE

February 05, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

73110000

REFERENCE

001425-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

RSSB seeks to procure desktop research into rail noise mitigation options and associated analysis of noise maps. This work will inform the development of the England Noise Action Plan for rail, and help inform the development of future rail noise policy. To view this notice, please click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/delta/viewNotice.html?noticeId=1004716436
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information. Bidders are expected to comply with standard public procurement regulations regarding exclusion.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific eligibility criteria (e.g., legal form, registration requirements) are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information. The procurement is an "Open" type.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate expertise in conducting desktop research.
  • Possess the capability to perform analysis of noise maps.
  • Exhibit knowledge of rail noise mitigation options.
  • Demonstrate understanding of the requirements for informing the development of the England Noise Action Plan for rail.
  • Demonstrate understanding of the requirements for informing the development of future rail noise policy.
  • Ability to deliver research services within a 9-month contract duration.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance levels) are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information. Bidders should be financially capable of undertaking a contract with an estimated value of 60,000 EUR.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-02-05 12:00:00.
  • Submit the bid via the Delta e-sourcing platform, accessible through the provided notice link.
  • Provide a proposal for desktop research into rail noise mitigation options.
  • Provide a proposal for associated analysis of noise maps.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF001425-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
RSSB is seeking desktop research and analysis of noise maps to inform the England Noise Action Plan for rail and future rail noise policy, with an estimated value of £50,000 and a tender submission deadline of 5 February 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a moderate quality assessment, primarily due to critical omissions in evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, alongside a notable inconsistency in the estimated value's currency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The tender defines its procedure type and CPV code correctly. However, the absence of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility criteria in the provided summary, along with a missing reveal date, indicates areas for improved transparency and full disclosure.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly detailed in the provided information.
No specific eligibility criteria explicitly detailed in the provided information.
Clarity55/100

While the project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity of the procurement process for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness60/100

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are present. However, the tender lacks explicit details on financial requirements, and only one of four documents is summarized. A significant concern is the inconsistency between the estimated value stated in EUR and the value mentioned in GBP in the PDF summary.

No specific financial requirements explicitly detailed.
Only one of four tender documents is summarized, indicating potential missing information.
Fairness50/100

The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria is a major impediment to fairness and transparency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The value inconsistency also raises concerns.

Absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts objectivity and transparency.
Inconsistency in estimated value currency.
Practicality75/100

The tender supports electronic submission via a provided URL, and key dates like contract start and duration are specified. The main area for improvement is the lack of detailed financing information beyond the estimated value.

Lack of detailed financing information beyond the estimated value.
Data Consistency65/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the discrepancy between the estimated value stated in EUR and the value mentioned in GBP in the PDF summary represents a significant data inconsistency.

Inconsistency in estimated value currency (£50,000 vs 60,000 EUR).
Sustainability40/100

The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus' characteristic, which is positive. However, it explicitly lacks green procurement, social criteria, or EU funding, indicating minimal integration of broader sustainability aspects.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and scope.
CPV code and NUTS code properly assigned.
Electronic submission supported via a dedicated platform.
Contract duration and start date clearly specified.
Innovation focus is a positive characteristic.

Concerns

Critical absence of specified evaluation criteria.
Inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (£ vs EUR).
Lack of explicit details for mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements.
Only one of four tender documents is summarized, suggesting incomplete information.
Minimal integration of green and social sustainability criteria.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly define and publish clear, objective evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Rectify the currency inconsistency in the estimated value to avoid bidder confusion.
3. Provide comprehensive details on mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements in the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
61/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes