Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and the timeline from launch to submission (28 days) is reasonable for an Open procedure. However, the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds is a notable legal oversight.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity65/100
While the service description and technical requirements are clearly articulated, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100
The tender provides essential information such as title, organization, value, and duration. However, it is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements for bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness35/100
The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the complete lack of transparent evaluation criteria. Additionally, the strong emphasis on 'proven experience' and 'good working knowledge of Tameside' could be perceived as unduly restrictive, potentially limiting competition to local or highly established providers.
•No evaluation criteria specified (impacts transparency and objectivity)
•Requirements for local knowledge and experience may be tailored, limiting competition
Practicality75/100
The tender supports electronic submission via a specified portal and provides clear contract start and duration dates. While the estimated value is known, more detailed financing information for bidders is not explicitly provided.
•Detailed financing information for bidders not explicitly available
Data Consistency80/100
Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the absence of a liable person and the gaps in specified requirements (exclusion, financial) indicate minor inconsistencies in the overall data structure.
•Liable Person field is empty
•Gaps in specified requirements (exclusion, financial)
Sustainability65/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria' and the service itself is inherently focused on social well-being, which is a strong positive. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement or innovation focus.
•Not green procurement
•No innovation focus