Legal Compliance65/100
The tender correctly identifies the procedure as a Light Touch Dynamic Purchasing System and assigns an appropriate CPV code. The rolling nature of a DPS generally ensures reasonable application periods. However, the lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria in the provided information represents a significant compliance risk regarding transparency and equal treatment.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Clarity60/100
The description of the service aims and scope is clear and well-detailed, outlining the person-centred approach and types of care. However, the overall clarity for bidders is severely compromised by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds, making it difficult to understand the full bidding landscape.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
•No specific financial requirements explicitly stated.
Completeness60/100
Basic information such as title, organization, reference, estimated value, and contract duration are well-defined. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of explicit evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds. Additionally, only one document summary out of four total documents was provided, suggesting potential gaps in accessible documentation.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
•No specific financial requirements explicitly stated.
Fairness50/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System with rolling applications and support for e-procurement generally promotes fair access. The technical requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely undermines fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis for selection, potentially leading to arbitrary decisions.
•No evaluation criteria specified, significantly impacting transparency and fairness.
Practicality80/100
The tender demonstrates good practicality by supporting e-procurement through a dedicated portal, providing a clear contract start date (01/01/2023), and specifying the duration (until 31/12/2026 with extension options). The estimated value is also disclosed.
Data Consistency85/100
The key fields are largely populated, and dates for the DPS contract and past rounds are logical and consistent with the nature of a DPS. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies noted in automated checks (e.g., 'No e-submission' vs. 'E-Procurement' characteristic) appear to be issues with the automated check rather than the tender data itself.
Sustainability70/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria' and emphasizes a person-centred, dignified, and non-discriminatory approach to care, addressing social aspects effectively. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement initiatives or innovation focus.
•No explicit mention of green procurement.
•No explicit innovation focus.