Responsive Repairs and Voids Sub Contractors

This tender is generally clear and well-structured, utilizing a Dynamic Purchasing System, but its summary lacks crucial evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements.

Legal compliance is generally good, leveraging a valid DPS procedure and correct CPV code. The main issues are the missing initial reveal date and the lack of explicit detail on mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the summary.

The description and extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria in the provided summary is a significant clarity gap for potential bidders.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location, is provided. However, the summary is incomplete regarding detailed financial requirements and, critically, evaluation criteria.

The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System, e-procurement, disclosed value, and generic requirements contribute positively to fairness. The primary concern for fairness is the explicit lack of evaluation criteria in the summary, which impacts transparency for bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. A notable practical drawback is the absence of a direct URL to the Delta eSourcing portal in the provided information.

Data is largely consistent, with no disputes or suspensions. The main inconsistency is the currency for the estimated value (EUR in financial info vs. GBP in description). The 'Liable Person' field is empty.

The inclusion of 'Social Criteria' is a strong positive, aligning with the organization's mission. However, the tender summary does not explicitly mention green procurement or innovation focus.