Mazās infrastruktūras un aprīkojuma uzstādīšana Vārves pagastā, Ventspils novadā

This tender presents a mixed quality assessment, with good clarity on requirements but significant concerns regarding fairness and data consistency due to restricted document access and conflicting information. The lack of estimated value and e-submission further detracts from its overall quality.

The tender generally complies with basic legal requirements, featuring reasonable deadlines, a clear open procedure, and no disputes. However, the undisclosed estimated value for an EU-funded open procedure is a transparency concern, though not necessarily a direct legal non-compliance if within national thresholds.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-defined at a high level. Document summaries explicitly state that evaluation criteria are outlined within the tender documents, indicating good clarity on the process, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise.

While essential information like title, organization, deadlines, duration, and location are provided, the critical absence of an estimated value significantly impacts the tender's completeness. All required documents are listed as attached.

Fairness is severely compromised by the 'Restricted document access' flag, which hinders equal opportunity for all bidders. The undisclosed estimated value and the lack of e-submission further reduce transparency and accessibility, raising significant concerns about the objectivity of the process.

The tender faces practical challenges due to the reported 'No e-submission' feature, which can complicate the bidding process. Furthermore, 'Restricted document access' creates a significant hurdle for potential bidders to obtain necessary information, impacting the ease of participation.

The tender data exhibits significant inconsistencies, including contradictions between AI summaries and automated checks regarding evaluation criteria, e-procurement capabilities, and document accessibility. These internal discrepancies undermine the reliability of the provided information.

The tender explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as indicated by automated checks. Despite being EU-funded, these sustainability dimensions are not integrated into the procurement requirements.