London, United Kingdom
£6,000,000
April 29, 2026 at 23:00
Other
001467-2026
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender presents significant quality concerns, primarily due to the absence of evaluation criteria, lack of e-submission, and critical data inconsistencies, despite clear technical requirements.
The tender defines a Restricted procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the explicit reservation to refine them raise significant legal transparency concerns. The lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and a missing reveal date are also notable gaps.
The description of the ECM platform and its technical requirements are clear and well-detailed. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity deficiency, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed.
Basic information, estimated value, and contract duration are provided, and requirements are detailed. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria significantly impacts completeness. There is also a contradiction between 'Divided into Parts' and the intent to award a 'single contract'.
The estimated value is disclosed, and the PSQ and final submission deadlines appear reasonable for preparation. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria, coupled with the reservation to refine them, severely undermines transparency and objectivity. The absence of e-submission also creates an unequal access barrier.
The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is a clear logical error, indicating a lack of practical process planning.
While most key fields are populated, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is a significant logical inconsistency. The contradiction between 'Divided into Parts' and 'single contract' also indicates data inconsistency.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes