Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type as an Open procedure under the Light Touch Regime of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the reveal date is missing, which prevents a full assessment of the initial 7-day rule. Crucially, specific evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly stated within the provided tender text, though they are referenced as being available on an external webpage.
•Missing reveal date
•Evaluation criteria not explicitly stated in the provided text
Clarity80/100
The description of the services, the division into lots, and the open list mechanism are clear and easy to understand. However, the specific requirements for applicants, detailed evaluation criteria, and performance conditions are not provided directly in the tender document, instead being deferred to an external webpage. The AI-extracted requirements are notably sparse.
•Specific requirements and evaluation criteria deferred to external link
•AI-extracted requirements are incomplete
Completeness70/100
The tender includes essential basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and CPV codes. However, critical details like the full set of tender documents, specific application requirements, and detailed evaluation criteria are not directly attached or fully summarized within the provided information, requiring access to an external URL.
•Full tender documents not directly provided/summarized
•Specific requirements and evaluation criteria not defined within the document
Fairness85/100
The tender promotes fairness through its open list structure, allowing continuous applications, and by enabling e-procurement. The estimated value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is exceptionally generous. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria within the provided text makes it challenging to fully assess their objectivity and transparency without consulting the external link. There is no indication of requirements being tailored.
•Evaluation criteria not explicitly stated in the provided text
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the iSupplier portal, and a direct URL to the full tender information is provided. The duration of the provider list and individual contracts is specified. However, the exact contract start date is not known, and applicants must navigate to an external webpage to access the complete tender package.
•Contract start date not specified
•Full tender package requires external navigation
Data Consistency90/100
The tender information is largely consistent, with logical dates and no mentioned disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. Minor gaps include an empty 'Liable Person' field and the missing reveal date. The automated flag regarding a short deadline is inconsistent with the provided submission date.
•'Liable Person' field is empty
•Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100
The core purpose of this tender is to provide essential social services for children and young people with disabilities, inherently addressing social aspects. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly include additional green procurement criteria, innovation focus, or specific social clauses for providers beyond the service delivery itself. It is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus