Crombie Avenue Play Area

This tender for the Crombie Avenue Play Area demonstrates good clarity in its project description and basic information, but suffers from significant gaps in detailing evaluation criteria and comprehensive legal/financial requirements within the summary, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. However, the missing reveal date and the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the summary are notable transparency issues. Mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are deferred to full documents, which, while common, reduces the immediate compliance visibility of the summary.

The project description, scope, contract duration, and start date are clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. Furthermore, key eligibility, exclusion, and specific financial thresholds are not detailed in the summary, requiring consultation of additional documents.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, value, duration, and location are well-provided. However, the tender summary is incomplete regarding crucial details like the reveal date, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and, most importantly, the complete absence of evaluation criteria.

The estimated value is disclosed, and technical requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their proposals will be assessed. The absence of e-submission also limits equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and the estimated value is known. The primary practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which can complicate the bidding process for some suppliers. While documents are available, a direct URL was not explicitly provided in the summary.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated, though minor gaps exist such as an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for Type/Procedure, along with the missing reveal date.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. As a below-threshold local project, this is not uncommon, but it also means no points are gained for these increasingly important aspects of modern procurement.