Living Well Stop Smoking Service

This tender for a stop smoking service demonstrates good clarity in its core description and utilizes e-procurement, but suffers from significant gaps in critical information such as evaluation criteria, contract value, and duration, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly. However, the estimated value is classified, and the reveal date is missing, which are disclosure gaps. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also poses a compliance risk regarding transparency.

The service description is clear and unambiguous, and eligibility requirements are well-defined. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

While basic information like title, organization, and reference are present, the tender is incomplete regarding crucial details such as the estimated value (classified), contract duration, and evaluation criteria. This hinders a comprehensive understanding for bidders.

The classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria are significant fairness concerns, as bidders cannot objectively assess the opportunity or understand how their proposals will be judged. While e-procurement is enabled and requirements are for a specific type of provider, these omissions undermine transparency.

E-Procurement is listed as a characteristic, which supports electronic submission. However, the absence of a clear contract start date, duration, and detailed financing information reduces the practicality for bidders to plan and allocate resources effectively.

Existing dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, several key fields, such as the liable person, estimated value, and contract duration, are unpopulated or classified, indicating gaps in the data rather than direct inconsistencies.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social criteria beyond the inherent service benefit, or innovation focus. While the service itself has a positive social impact, the tender documentation does not leverage procurement to drive broader sustainability objectives.