Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly. However, the missing reveal date and, more critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance concerns regarding transparency and equal treatment under procurement regulations.
•Missing reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity60/100
The service description, geographical scope, and lot structure are clearly articulated. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the full content of the 'Selection Questionnaire' (which presumably contains detailed requirements) significantly reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Full 'Selection Questionnaire' content not provided
Completeness65/100
Basic information such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are complete. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria and the full set of tender documents (e.g., the detailed specification and Selection Questionnaire) is not fully accessible in the provided information, impacting overall completeness.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Full tender documents (Selection Questionnaire, detailed specification) not provided in analysis scope
Fairness55/100
The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access. While requirements do not appear tailored, these omissions significantly impact transparency and equal opportunity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission functionality
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission functionality and a direct document URL reduces the practicality and efficiency for bidders.
•No e-submission functionality
•Document URL not provided
Data Consistency80/100
The core data fields are largely consistent and logical, with dates aligning correctly. Minor gaps include the 'Liable Person' field being empty and 'Type (Code)'/'Procedure (Code)' being 'N/A', but these do not introduce contradictions.
•'Liable Person' field empty
•Missing reveal date
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. There is no indication of EU funding, which often drives higher sustainability standards.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria