Industrial Doors , Maintenance, Overhaul and New Installations

This tender provides a clear description of services and utilizes an e-sourcing portal, but suffers from critical data inconsistencies and a significant lack of specified evaluation criteria, impacting transparency and practicality.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the 'Over Sum Limit: No' for an 852k EUR value is ambiguous regarding relevant procurement thresholds, and mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided summary, requiring reference to full documents.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and understandable. However, a major deficiency is the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for bidders to formulate competitive proposals.

Basic information, including title, organization, value, and duration, is provided. Requirements are outlined, and documents are accessible via the portal. Nevertheless, the critical omission of evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete in a fundamental aspect.

Full document access via an e-sourcing portal and generic, non-tailored requirements contribute positively to fairness. The disclosed value also enhances transparency. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines the objectivity and transparency of the procurement process.

Electronic submission is supported, and document URLs are provided, which are practical aspects. However, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is highly impractical and indicates a significant error in the tender's timeline, which could cause operational issues.

This category presents significant issues. The contract start date is illogically identical to the submission deadline. Furthermore, there is a critical currency discrepancy for the estimated value (£852,000 in PDF summary vs. 852,000.00 EUR in basic info). The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag also contradicts the disclosed value.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. As it is not EU funded, these elements are not mandated, resulting in a neutral score due to the absence of information.