Withy Grove Park and Car Park Improvements

The tender exhibits moderate quality, providing essential information but lacking critical details such as explicit evaluation criteria and comprehensive requirements, which impacts fairness and clarity.

The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV codes. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the tender reveal date are minor compliance gaps for full transparency.

The project description is clear, but the most significant issue is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how proposals will be judged. Requirements are also quite generic.

While basic information is present, key details such as explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements are missing. Eligibility and technical requirements are also very high-level.

The complete absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely compromises the transparency and objectivity of the tender process, potentially hindering fair competition. While requirements are generic (which is good for avoiding tailoring), the lack of clear assessment rules is a major drawback.

Electronic submission is supported via 'The Chest' portal, and key dates like contract start and duration are provided. However, the lack of detailed requirements could make bid preparation less practical for potential suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is an inconsistency between the PDF summary mentioning 'award criteria' and the explicit 'Issues' flag stating 'No evaluation criteria specified'. The reveal date is also missing.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU funded, resulting in a low score for this category.