Supply of film dosimetry system and phantom

This tender presents a moderate quality assessment, demonstrating good clarity in requirements and legal adherence in some aspects, but significantly hampered by issues of fairness, completeness, and practicality due to restricted document access, undisclosed value, and lack of electronic submission.

The tender defines an open procedure, provides a CPV code, and indicates EU funding, suggesting adherence to broader regulations. The submission deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a significant concern for legal transparency and equal access.

The tender's description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are detailed and well-structured, including specific documents for different parts. Draft contracts are provided, outlining performance conditions. The 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag, despite mentions in document summaries, suggests potential ambiguity in their comprehensive presentation.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location (NUTS code) are provided, and all 11 documents are attached. However, the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' is a significant omission, and the 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag also impacts the overall completeness of critical information.

Fairness is significantly compromised by 'Restricted document access' and the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed', which hinders transparency. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and 'No e-submission' being flagged is a major concern for equal access. The 'manufacturer authorization' requirement could be restrictive, potentially limiting competition.

The tender's practicality is notably reduced by the 'No e-submission' flag, which creates a significant hurdle for bidders. 'Restricted document access' also poses practical challenges. While duration is specified, a clear contract start date is not.

Dates are logical and there are no disputes. However, a major inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' flag. Minor inconsistencies include 'Code: N/A' for procedure type and the undisclosed estimated value.

Despite being EU Funded, the tender explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as indicated by the automated checks. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.