Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines its procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information represents a moderate compliance gap.
•Missing reveal date
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds specified
Clarity60/100
The project description and technical requirements are clearly articulated. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness60/100
While basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, the tender lacks crucial details such as explicit evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds, which are essential for a comprehensive tender package.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No explicit financial requirements specified
Fairness50/100
The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. Additionally, the lack of e-submission capabilities may hinder equal access for all potential bidders. No evidence of tailoring was found.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The tender specifies a clear contract start date and duration. However, the absence of electronic submission functionality is a notable practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.
Data Consistency90/100
Key dates and financial information are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor gaps include an unpopulated 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure types.
•Liable Person field empty
•N/A codes for procedure type
Sustainability50/100
The tender inherently focuses on a strong social aspect by empowering young people and explicitly includes an innovation focus. However, it does not specify any green procurement criteria or broader social criteria for suppliers beyond the project's core objective.
•Not green procurement
•No explicit social criteria for suppliers