Youth & Community Funding Generator

This tender for a Youth & Community Funding Generator demonstrates good clarity in its service description and requirements, but is significantly hampered by the absence of evaluation criteria and lack of e-submission, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. The 26-day submission period is reasonable for a below-threshold open competition. However, the missing reveal date and the lack of explicitly identified mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary are minor compliance concerns.

The description of services and AI-extracted requirements are very clear, detailed, and unambiguous, outlining precisely what is expected. A significant drawback, however, is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which leaves bidders without clear guidance on how their proposals will be assessed.

Most essential information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location is provided. The requirements are also well-detailed. The primary deficiency is the lack of evaluation criteria, which is a critical component for a complete tender package. Only one document summary out of four is provided, suggesting potential further missing details.

The tender's estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness of the bidding process. Additionally, the lack of e-submission creates barriers to equal access and participation.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. Nevertheless, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical impediment for bidders. A direct document URL is also not provided, potentially complicating access to full tender documents.

The tender exhibits good data consistency, with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor omissions include the 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure types, but these do not significantly impact overall consistency.

While the core service aims to support community groups, the tender documentation itself does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, broader social criteria for the bidder, or an innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to promote wider sustainability objectives.