Elektrilevi OÜ connection in Soo and Võru substations

This tender for substation construction works presents a detailed scope and clear requirements but is significantly hampered by a critical CPV code error and internal inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria and procedure type.

The tender suffers from a critical error in CPV code assignment, classifying 'Substation construction works' under 'Sporting services' (9284), which is a major legal non-compliance. The procedure type 'LM' is also vaguely defined without a standard code.

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and comprehensive. However, there is a direct contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation characteristic and the explicit instruction to evaluate 'solely based on the total tender cost (excluding VAT), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.'

Basic information, deadlines, and value are provided. Detailed requirements are outlined, and location information is clear. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main tender data, and the AI could not analyze the content of many crucial .zip documents, limiting a full assessment of their completeness.

The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines for submission are reasonable. While access to some documents requires a confidentiality agreement, the process is outlined, and there is no indication that requirements are tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission is supported, and financing information is available through the draft contract and required bidder schedule. The contract start date is provided, though noted as indicative. The overall duration is not explicitly stated, relying on the draft contract.

A significant inconsistency exists between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the 'lowest price' evaluation criterion. The procedure type 'LM' is vague, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' label contradicts the disclosed estimated value.

The tender includes a general statement about environmentally safe execution of works but lacks specific green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded.