Kehtna Municipality Green Area Maintenance 2026-2028

This tender for green area maintenance in Kehtna municipality is well-structured and transparent, featuring clear requirements and fair evaluation criteria. While strong in most aspects, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines and an appropriate CPV code. A minor ambiguity exists regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' within a procedure type 'A' (Open procedure), which typically does not permit negotiation, but 'Pöördmenetlus' (reverse procedure) is a valid national practice. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The tender is highly clear, with detailed technical specifications, well-defined eligibility and financial requirements, and explicit evaluation criteria (lowest price). The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand. The 'Required: No' for some essential documents is a minor point of potential confusion, but their content is clearly mandatory.

Most essential information is provided, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The NUTS code is missing, which is a minor omission, but the geographical scope is clearly defined within the municipality.

This tender scores highly on fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, providing reasonable submission deadlines, and employing objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). Electronic submission and e-procurement further ensure equal access. Requirements are detailed but appear generic and not tailored.

The tender supports electronic submission, clearly states the contract start date and duration, and provides the opening place URL. Financing information is available through the estimated value.

The tender information is largely consistent, with logical dates and populated key fields. Minor inconsistencies include the missing NUTS code and the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' for an 'Open' procedure. The automated check's flags regarding missing evaluation criteria and contract duration were incorrect based on document content.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.