Surfacing Works in the Western Region 2026

This tender demonstrates good overall quality with clear requirements and fair processes, though it has some gaps in completeness regarding contract duration and unanalyzed key documents, and limited focus on broader sustainability aspects beyond green procurement.

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, featuring reasonable submission deadlines, proper CPV code assignment, and the use of ESPD, indicating adherence to EU/national regulations. The 'N/A' for procedure codes is a minor point.

Clarity is strong, with detailed AI-extracted requirements covering all key aspects and explicit specification of the 'lowest price' as the sole evaluation criterion, contradicting the automated check's finding.

While basic information, requirements, and evaluation criteria are present, the tender lacks explicit contract duration in the main overview. Furthermore, several critical technical documents (zip files) were not analyzable, limiting insight into detailed specifications.

Fairness is well-addressed, with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and the division into parts enhances competition.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and duration, along with limited specific financing details beyond the estimated value, slightly reduces the practicality score.

Data consistency is good, with key fields mostly populated and logical dates. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor gaps include the missing NUTS code and the N/A procedure codes.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' characteristics, which is positive. However, it lacks explicit social criteria and innovation focus, and is not EU funded, limiting its overall sustainability score.