← Back to Tenders
Estonia8 days leftOpen

Self-expanding supra-annular aortic valve for small valves and VIV

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€912,000

DEADLINE

February 10, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Supplies

CPV CODE

33182220-7

REFERENCE

304130

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Isedilateeruva supra-annulaarse aordiklapi ostmine väikeste klappide ja VIV jaoks
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidders must meet the mandatory exclusion criteria outlined by the contracting authority in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must meet the qualification criteria outlined by the contracting authority in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
  • Bidders must meet the mandatory conditions for submitting a tender proposal.
  • Bidders must be able to supply catheter-implantable aortic valves and their installation tools.
  • Bidders must agree to the terms of the draft framework agreement, including supply until November 30, 2027, with a possibility of extension.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The offered transcatheter aortic valves (TAVI) and related equipment must comply with the detailed technical specifications.
  • Bidders must be prepared for the process of testing offered products.
  • Bidders must provide product codes, names, technical parameters, and manufacturer details for the offered self-dilating supra-annular aortic valves.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must structure their costs according to the specified cost structure requirements.
  • The tender price must account for all costs and obligations.
  • Bids will be evaluated solely on the total cost (excluding VAT), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Tenders must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-02-10 12:00:00.
  • Bidders must adhere to the specified formats for submitting a tender proposal.
  • Bidders must submit all necessary supporting documents.
  • Bidders must comply with the rules for joint bids, if applicable.
  • Bidders must use the mandatory cost form to submit product codes, names, technical parameters, manufacturer details, quantities, unit prices, and total costs for the offered self-dilating supra-annular aortic valves.
  • Bidders must submit the tender submission application.
  • In the tender submission application, the bidder must confirm having reviewed and accepted the procurement terms.
  • In the tender submission application, the bidder must confirm that all costs and obligations have been accounted for in the tender price.
  • Bidders must provide instructions for tender submission as detailed in the technical specifications document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused304130_vastavustingimused.pdf7.2 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the mandatory conditions and formats for submitting a tender proposal, including technical requirements, cost structure, necessary supporting documents, and rules for joint bids.
XLS
Ettevõtja esitab täidetud maksumuse vormi
Esitamise Vormid304130 maksumuse vorm.xlsx14.1 KB
Summary:
This is a mandatory cost form for submitting product codes, names, technical parameters, manufacturer details, quantities, unit prices, and total costs for the offered self-dilating supra-annular aortic valves.
DOC
Ettevõtja esitab täidetud pakkumuse vormi
Tehnilised Spetsifikatsioonid304130 tehniline kirjeldus.docx52.6 KB
Summary:
This document details the technical specifications for transcatheter aortic valves (TAVI) and related equipment, along with instructions for tender submission and the process for testing offered products.
DOC
Ettevõtja kinnitab, et täidab kõik hankemenetluse osalemise avalduses toodud tin...
Esitamise VormidHankemenetluses osalemise avaldus.docx50.7 KB
Summary:
This document is a tender submission application where the bidder confirms having reviewed and accepted the procurement terms, and has accounted for all costs and obligations in the tender price.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304130_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf3.1 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that the total cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion with a 100% weighting, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304130_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...62.9 KB
Summary:
This document serves as an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria for bidders, but it is for informational purposes only and not for submission.
DOC
Raamlepingu projekt
Lepingu Mall304130 raamlepingu projekt.docx50.6 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms for the supply and sale of catheter-implantable aortic valves and their installation tools to SA Põhja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla until November 30, 2027, with a possibility of extension.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

Overall, the tender is well-structured with clear evaluation criteria, but significant concerns arise from the ambiguous procedure type and severely limited competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates compliance with general legal frameworks, including reasonable submission deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. However, the procedure type is ambiguously defined as 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' with N/A codes, which is a notable deviation from standard procurement terminology.

•Ambiguous procedure type ('Type: A', 'Procedure: A' with N/A codes)
Clarity85/100

The tender's description is specific, and requirements are comprehensively detailed across various categories. The evaluation criteria, based solely on the lowest total cost (excluding VAT) with 100% weighting, are exceptionally clear and unambiguous.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, financial details, and deadlines, is provided. While the framework agreement duration is specified, a distinct 'contract duration' field could be clearer. One XML document was listed but not analyzed by AI, representing a minor gap in content processing.

•Contract duration could be more explicitly defined as a single field
•One XML document not analyzed by AI
Fairness45/100

The 'Max Participants: 1' characteristic, combined with the highly specialized nature of the product and the explicit statement that the procurement is not divided into parts, raises significant concerns about severely limited competition and potential tailoring of requirements. While evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price), the restricted pool of potential bidders compromises fairness.

•'Max Participants: 1' severely limits competition
•Highly specialized product not divided into lots, further restricting competition
Practicality85/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility. Key dates such as the contract start date and financing information are clearly provided, contributing to practical execution.

Data Consistency80/100

Dates and financial figures are logical and consistent throughout the tender. The primary inconsistency lies in the non-standard and ambiguous 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' codes for the procurement process.

•Non-standard and ambiguous procedure type codes
Sustainability20/100

The tender lacks any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This is a common omission in highly specialized medical device procurements but results in a low score for this category.

•No green procurement criteria
•No social aspects included

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% lowest price)
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements covering key aspects
Strong support for electronic submission and e-procurement
Reasonable submission deadline for preparation
Detailed technical specifications and draft framework agreement provided

Concerns

Ambiguous procurement procedure type ('Type: A', 'Procedure: A' with N/A codes)
'Max Participants: 1' raises significant concerns about limited competition and potential tailoring
Highly specialized product not divided into lots, further restricting competition
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
One XML tender document not analyzed by AI, potentially hiding details

Recommendations

1. Clearly define the procurement procedure type using standard, recognized terminology.
2. Provide a robust justification for 'Max Participants: 1' and the decision not to divide the procurement into lots, demonstrating thorough market research to ensure fair competition.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where feasible, even for specialized medical devices, to align with broader public procurement goals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
70/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes