Design works for the removal of sediment from Koreli stream and Vanajõgi river, and the construction of Kaare protective dam

This tender for design services is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and document access, though some minor ambiguities exist in procedure classification and sustainability integration.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and mention of EU sanctions compliance align with EU/national regulations. A minor ambiguity exists in the 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes being 'N/A' and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic conflicting with 'lowest price' as the sole evaluation criterion, typically associated with open procedures.

The tender's description is clear and concise, outlining the project scope effectively. Requirements are well-categorized and understandable, supported by specific documents like 'Instructions to bidder' and 'Scope of Service'. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'lowest price', ensuring transparency.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are comprehensively defined across various documents. However, the content of some attached documents could not be analyzed, and the 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are missing.

Fairness is strong, with full document access implied by the list of attachments and e-procurement. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent, based solely on the lowest price. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to any specific company.

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality. Financing information is clearly referenced to the contract terms. While the contract duration is specified, an explicit contract start date is not provided, which is a minor practical detail.

Data consistency is high, with key fields populated and logical dates. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The minor 'N/A' codes for procedure type are the only slight inconsistency.

While the project itself involves environmental aspects (sediment removal, dam construction, environmental impact assessment), the procurement criteria for the design services do not explicitly include green, social, or innovation aspects. The tender is EU funded, which often implies higher standards, but these are not reflected in specific sustainability criteria for bidders.