Surface dressing works in the southern region 2026

This tender for road surfacing works demonstrates good transparency in financial and evaluation criteria, supported by e-procurement. However, it suffers from missing contract duration and some ambiguity in the procurement procedure type.

The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and correctly assigned CPV codes. However, the procedure type ('E', 'A' with N/A codes) is vague, and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic, if applied to an open procedure, could be a legal concern. Mandatory disclosure is mostly met, though the NUTS code is missing.

Evaluation criteria (100% lowest price) and financial requirements are clearly stated. Submission requirements are also clear. However, the AI-extracted summary lacks explicit technical capability requirements, and detailed performance conditions are likely within unanalyzed .zip documents, which limits overall clarity of the provided information.

Basic information, deadlines, and estimated value are provided. However, the crucial contract duration and start date are missing. While specific counties are mentioned, the NUTS code is absent. Furthermore, several key documents (e.g., detailed work descriptions, draft contract) are in unanalyzed .zip formats, impacting the completeness of the reviewable content.

The tender exhibits strong fairness aspects, including full value disclosure, a reasonable preparation deadline (49 days), objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), and the use of e-procurement. Its division into parts and WTO/GPA characteristic further promote competition and equal access, with no indication of tailored requirements.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are well-supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and duration poses significant practical challenges for bidders in planning and resource allocation.

The tender data is largely consistent, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Key fields are mostly populated, with the primary 'inconsistencies' being omissions (NUTS code, contract duration) rather than conflicting information.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' characteristics, which is a positive. However, it lacks explicit mention of broader social aspects or an innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.